SN-10190 附来源、原文与上下文。
对,忘了这一点。
Right, forgot about that.
希望 theymos 说得对,问题确实出在 PBL。
Hopefully theymos was right that the PBL is the source of the problem.
Martti 回答私信通知是否关闭Martti Malmi来源 ↗是的,它们仍然禁用着。禁止访问邮件服务器很容易,但我们大概还想保留通过邮件找回密码的功能。
Yes, they're still disabled. Disabling the access to the mail server would be easy, but we probably want to keep the password recovery by email.
引用中本聪此前的询问中本聪来源 ↗私信通知仍然禁用着吗?(我们实际需要的,只是禁止论坛访问邮件服务器。)
Are PM notifications still disabled? (All we really need is disable the forum's access to the mail server)
被引用的 Martti 早先回复Martti Malmi来源 ↗现在运作正常了吗?我之前修改了一些论坛代码,用来禁用私信邮件通知,但刚刚把大部分改动撤回了,因为没有必要。
Does it work correctly now? I had made some forum code changes to disable PM email notification, but just reverted most of them as unnecessary.
Martti 的来信Martti Malmi来源 ↗我向 PBL 发送了移除请求。
I sent a removal request to PBL.
Martti 引入 PBL FAQMartti Malmi来源 ↗常见问题解答说:
The FAQ says:
Martti 引用的 PBL FAQSpamhaus PBL FAQ来源 ↗“首先要知道:PBL 不是黑名单。你被列入,不是因为发送垃圾邮件,也不是因为做过什么。PBL 只是列出世界上所有动态 IP 地址空间,也就是通常分配给 ISP 宽带客户的 IP 范围(DSL、DHCP、PPP、有线、拨号)。动态 IP 地址列入 PBL 完全正常。事实上,全世界所有动态 IP 地址都应该在 PBL 上。即使是不发送邮件的静态 IP,也应该列入 PBL。”
"The first thing to know is: THE PBL IS NOT A BLACKLIST. You are not listed for spamming or for anything you have done. The PBL is simply a list of all of the world's dynamic IP space, i.e: IP ranges normally assigned to ISP broadband customers (DSL, DHCP, PPP, cable, dialup). It is perfectly normal for dynamic IP addresses to be listed on the PBL. In fact all dynamic IP addresses in the world should be on the PBL. Even static IPs which do not send mail should be listed in the PBL."
Martti 对 PBL 列表的说明Martti Malmi来源 ↗所以,我们甚至不需要允许垃圾邮件,也会被列入。
So we didn't even need to allow spam to be on the list.
引用中本聪转发的旧邮件中本聪来源 ↗再发一次 PBL 相关信息。
Here's the info about PBL again.
-------- 原始邮件 -------- 主题:论坛邮件通知、PBL 黑名单与 Wiki 注册日期:Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:18:56 +0100 发件人:Satoshi Nakamoto satoshin@gmx.com 收件人:Martti Malmi mmalmi@cc.hut.fi
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Forum e-mail notifications and PBL blacklist and wiki registration Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:18:56 +0100 From: Satoshi Nakamoto satoshin@gmx.com To: Martti Malmi mmalmi@cc.hut.fi
旧邮件引用的论坛帖末句RHorning来源 ↗……邮件黑洞名单,或者至少托管注册邮件服务器的 ISP 在这类名单之一上。
of e-mail blackhole list or at least the ISP that hosts the e-mail server for registration is on one of those lists.
论坛中的后续回复theymos来源 ↗“看起来 bitcoin.org 被列入了 PBL。” http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL340779
"Looks like bitcoin.org is listed on the PBL." http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL340779
中本聪旧邮件中的处理意见中本聪来源 ↗我想,我们的问题可能是开启了论坛通知,例如收到私信就发邮件,但又没有对新账号进行电子邮件验证。有人能否不经过验证,就填写别人的邮件地址,再让内容发送到那里?我们需要马上制止,免得被用于坏事。要么禁止所有通知,要么确保邮件地址经过验证。
I think our problem may be that we have forum notifications on, like e-mail you when you receive a PM, but we don't have e-mail verification of new accounts. Can someone put someone else's e-mail address without verifying it, then have stuff sent there? We need to stop that right away before it gets used for something bad. Either disallow all notification, or make sure e-mail addresses are verified.
我更倾向于禁止通知,以及任何由论坛向用户发送邮件的功能。我挺喜欢不要求邮件验证。但如果这是确保我们不向未经验证的地址发送邮件的唯一办法,那就可以这样做。
I'm more inclined to disallow notifications or anything where the forum sends you e-mail. I kinda like not requiring e-mail verification. But if that's the only way to make sure we don't send e-mails to un-verified addresses, then we could do that.
如果我们请求从 PBL 移除,最好先确保问题已经处理妥当。
If we request to get off of PBL, we'd better make sure we've got the problem secured first.
我把 Registration->settings->registration of new members 改成了“Member Activation”。我猜这意味着通过邮件验证。
I changed Registration->settings->registration of new members to "Member Activation". I assume that means it e-mail verifies.
中本聪引用的 Member Activation 说明SMF 功能说明来源 ↗“会员激活启用此选项后,任何注册论坛的会员都会收到一封含激活链接的邮件,必须点击它,才能成为正式会员。”
"Member Activation When this option is enabled any members registering to the forum will have a activation link emailed to them which they must click before they can become full members"
中本聪旧邮件的结尾中本聪来源 ↗我想,这是确保论坛不能被用来向别人邮件地址发送内容、从而可能发送垃圾邮件的唯一办法。
I think that's the only way to make sure the forum can't be used to send to other people's e-mail addresses and potentially use it to spam.