James A. Donald 写道：
James A. Donald wrote:
引用的来信James A. Donald来源 ↗此外，它无法运作，因为在这个系统提案中，追踪谁拥有哪些币的工作是靠铸币税支付报酬的，而这需要通货膨胀。
Furthermore, it cannot be made to work, as in the proposed system the work of tracking who owns what coins is paid for by seigniorage, which requires inflation.
如果你对通货膨胀这一点有顾虑，很容易把它调整为通过手续费支付。办法很简单：让任何一笔交易的输出金额都比输入金额少 1 分钱。客户端软件可以自动生成金额比预定付款金额多 1 分钱的交易，或者也可以从收款方扣除。当节点找到一个区块的工作量证明时，其奖励金额可以是该区块内手续费的总和。
If you're having trouble with the inflation issue, it's easy to tweak it for transaction fees instead. It's as simple as this: let the output value from any transaction be 1 cent less than the input value. Either the client software automatically writes transactions for 1 cent more than the intended payment value, or it could come out of the payee's side. The incentive value when a node finds a proof-of-work for a block could be the total of the fees in the block.
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto
当前版本尚未建立逐条校对状态记录。来源核验、历史审校与当前译文校对是不同事项。
译文内容版本：066cb75fb554。用于比对文本，不代表校对等级或更新时间。
请填写对应原文、现译文、建议译法和理由。复制后通过你联系本站作者的渠道提交；此处不会自动发送。
