其他参与者原话Insti原帖 ↗它似乎弊大于利，因为它妨碍了 bytemaster 所提议的那类微支付方案的实现。
It seems to do more harm than good because it prevents micropayment implementations such as the one bytemaster is suggesting.
Bitcoin 目前还不适合金额极小的微支付。例如，没有合并结算机制的按次搜索或按页浏览付费，以及金额低于 0.01 的付款。目前对粉尘垃圾交易设置的限制，就是有意阻止这类金额过小的微支付的初步尝试。
Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments. Not for things like pay per search or per page view without an aggregating mechanism, not things needing to pay less than 0.01. The dust spam limit is a first try at intentionally trying to prevent overly small micropayments like that.
Bitcoin 可以处理一些小额交易，而这些交易用现有支付方式处理并不划算。它能处理的金额足够小，可以覆盖微支付中金额较大的一部分。但它并不声称能实际支持金额小到任何程度的微支付。
Bitcoin is practical for smaller transactions than are practical with existing payment methods. Small enough to include what you might call the top of the micropayment range. But it doesn't claim to be practical for arbitrarily small micropayments.
当前版本尚未建立逐条校对状态记录。来源核验、历史审校与当前译文校对是不同事项。
译文内容版本：eb79267ce317。用于比对文本，不代表校对等级或更新时间。
请填写对应原文、现译文、建议译法和理由。复制后通过你联系本站作者的渠道提交；此处不会自动发送。
