Bitcointalk · 0.3 almost ready -- please test the Mac version!

中本聪,2010 年 6 月 25 日

SN-0800 已核对来源,附原文与上下文。

阅读语言
中文译文

我不知道。也许更有 Linux 经验的人知道怎么装它需要的库。

我是在 Ubuntu 10.04 上构建的。我希望那不是个错误。也许应该构建在更老的版本上以获得更多向后兼容。Linux 上有这个问题吗:在最新版上构建,在旧版上就不好使?在 10.04 上我有什么办法降级到旧版 GCC 吗?

64 位版不应比 32 位版快,但如果有人能对两个 linux 版本做一次并排对比、核实一下就太好了。SHA-256 是 32 位算法,BitcoinMiner 里完全没有用到 64 位。

Windows 我们不必费心做 64 位版。32 位程序能在所有版本的 Windows 上运行。不像 Linux,64 位系统非要用 64 位程序。

我也好奇它在 linux 上是不是比 windows 上稍快一点。

你觉得我该把目录做成: /bin32/ /bin64/ 还是 /bin/32/ /bin/64/

ORIGINAL · 英文原文
I don't know.  Maybe someone with more Linux experience knows how to install the library it needs.

I built it on Ubuntu 10.04.  I hope that wasn't a mistake.  Maybe it should have been built on an older version for more backward compatibility.  Is this a problem on Linux, that if you build on the latest version, then it has trouble working on older versions?  Is there any way I can downgrade to an older version of GCC on 10.04?

The 64-bit version shouldn't be any faster than the 32-bit version, but it would be great if someone could do a side-by-side comparison of the two linux versions and check.  SHA-256 is a 32-bit algorithm and nothing in BitcoinMiner uses 64-bit at all.

We don't need to bother with a 64-bit version for Windows.  32-bit programs work on all versions of Windows.  It's not like Linux where the 64-bit OS wants 64-bit programs.

I'm also curious if it's a little faster on linux than windows.

Do you think I should make the directories:
/bin32/
/bin64/
instead of
/bin/32/
/bin/64/
来源
Bitcointalk 原始链接 ↗ 记录编号 SN-0800