Bitcointalk · BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin

中本聪,2010 年 12 月 11 日

SN-3620 已核对来源,附原文与上下文。

阅读语言
中文译文

@dtvan:这 3 点都很到位。 1) IP 记录不必进链,仅仅做注册商功能,不做 DNS。顺带把 CA 问题亦解决了,漂亮。 2) 选一个顶级域名,.web +1。 3) 过期机制加可观的续期费用,相当重要。

不过现在多想了想,我支持在主网络中加入额外的 coinbase/记录系统。这么做的原因是避免 CPU 算力被稀释到多个网络。我们要的是一张强大的网络,因而网络理应是多能的。

避免 CPU 算力碎片化已然不是理由了。独立的网络/链能够在不共享其他东西的前提下共享算力。参见:http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715

ORIGINAL · 英文原文
@dtvan: all 3 excellent points.
1) IP records don't need to be in the chain, just do registrar function not DNS.  And CA problem solved, neat.
2) Pick one TLD, .web +1.
3) Expiration and significant renewal costs, very important.

However, thinking more about this now I support inclusion of additional coinbases / tracking systems in the main network. The reason for doing this is so as not to water down CPU power into multiple networks. We want one strong network, so the network should be versatile.
Avoiding CPU power fragmentation is no longer a reason.  Independent networks/chains can share CPU power without sharing much else.  See: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696 and http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715
上下文
← 上一条 SN-3620 · 当前 下一条 → 在档案中查看完整主题串 →
来源
Bitcointalk 原始链接 ↗ 记录编号 SN-3620