@dtvan：这 3 点都很到位。
@dtvan: all 3 excellent points.
1) IP 记录不必进链，只做注册商功能，不做 DNS。顺带把 CA 问题也解决了，漂亮。
1) IP records don't need to be in the chain, just do registrar function not DNS. And CA problem solved, neat.
2) 选一个顶级域名，.web +1。
2) Pick one TLD, .web +1.
3) 过期机制加可观的续期费用，相当重要。
3) Expiration and significant renewal costs, very important.
其他参与者原话joe原帖 ↗不过现在多想了想，我支持在主网络中加入额外的 coinbase/记录系统。这么做的原因是避免 CPU 算力被稀释到多个网络。我们要的是一张强大的网络，因此网络应该具备多种功能。
However, thinking more about this now I support inclusion of additional coinbases / tracking systems in the main network. The reason for doing this is so as not to water down CPU power into multiple networks. We want one strong network, so the network should be versatile.
避免 CPU 算力碎片化已经不是理由了。独立的网络/链能在无需共享太多其他内容的情况下共享算力。参见：http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696 和 http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715
Avoiding CPU power fragmentation is no longer a reason. Independent networks/chains can share CPU power without sharing much else. See: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28696#msg28696 and http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28715#msg28715
当前版本尚未建立逐条校对状态记录。来源核验、历史审校与当前译文校对是不同事项。
译文内容版本：5fa83bf9dbc3。用于比对文本，不代表校对等级或更新时间。
请填写对应原文、现译文、建议译法和理由。复制后通过你联系本站作者的渠道提交；此处不会自动发送。
