Bitcointalk · URI-scheme for bitcoin

中本聪,2010 年 6 月 16 日

SN-0318 已核对来源,附原文与上下文。

阅读语言
中文译文

http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=domain.com&amount=200.00&comment=order_12345http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=1.2.3.4&amount=200.00

但既然链接已经替你把字都打好了,我看不出用域名地址代替比特币地址有什么好处。用比特币地址,用户无法发出一笔身份不明的付款。在拿到一个正确的比特币地址之前,他们根本无法付款。

按域名发送的好处是你可以直观地核实钱发给了谁。

一个更关键的问题是:如果浏览器不被允许连接 127.0.0.1 怎么办: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg1589#msg1589

而且如果真是这样,那个包含 127.0.0.1 的 freenet 链接示例又怎么说?

ORIGINAL · 英文原文
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=domain.com&amount=200.00&comment=order_12345
or
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=<bitcoinaddress><separatorchar>1.2.3.4&amount=200.00

But as long as the link is already doing the typing for you, I don't see much benefit in using a domain address instead of bitcoin address.  With a bitcoin address, the user can't send an unidentified payment.  They can't send payment until they've been given a correct bitcoin address to send to.

What would be nice about sending by domain is you could visually verify who it's going to.


A more crucial issue is what if the browser isn't allowed to connect to 127.0.0.1:
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg1589#msg1589

and if that's true, then what about that example freenet link that had 127.0.0.1 in it?
来源
Bitcointalk 原始链接 ↗ 记录编号 SN-0318