其他参与者原话Karmicads原帖 ↗freenet URI 是这样的：
A freenet URI is like this:
瞧，我们完全可以照同样的方式做，比如：
There you go, we could easily do it the same way, like:
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=
http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=
Bitcoin 可以像在 8332 上应答 JSON-RPC 那样，在本地回环的 8330 端口上应答，给出 HTTP 应答。
Bitcoin can answer port 8330 on local loopback just as it does for JSON-RPC on 8332. It would give an HTTP answer.
其他参与者原话DataWraith原帖 ↗依我看，bitcoin 链接应该更像 mailto: 而不是 magnet:。
A bitcoin-link should be more like mailto: than magnet: IMHO.
我想我们能办到。
I think we can do that.
虽然 Bitcoin 有可能在 HTTP 应答里呈现 HTML 界面、直接把事情办了，但作为用户，我会疑惑：是某个网站想骗我，还是我真的在和自己的 Bitcoin 服务器对话？
Although it would be possible for Bitcoin to take care of business in the HTTP response by presenting HTML UI to the user, as a user I would wonder if some website is trying to trick me or if I'm really talking to my own Bitcoin server.
HTTP 应答可以只是一段带 JavaScript 的 HTML，等价于后退按钮，把浏览器送回原页面。然后 Bitcoin 弹出发送比特币对话框，目标比特币地址和金额已经填好。工作方式就像 mailto: 链接弹出一个已填好地址的新邮件。
The HTTP response could simply be HTML with the JavaScript equivalent of the back button, sending it back to the page. Bitcoin then pops up the Send Bitcoins dialog with the destination bitcoin address and amount already filled in. It would work just like a mailto: link that pops up a new email with the address filled in.
127.0.0.1 回环对机器上的任何用户都可访问，没有按用户隔离，但这没关系，因为它只提供"预填对话框字段"的便利功能。你仍然得按发送。我们要确保发送按钮不处于选中状态，免得你正在敲空格或回车时它跳到前台。
127.0.0.1 loopback is accessible by any user on the machine, it doesn't have per-user separation, but it's OK because it would only serve the convenience function of pre-filling the fields in a dialog. You'd still have to press Send. We'd have to make sure the Send button is not selected so it couldn't jump into the foreground while you're typing a space or enter.
当前版本尚未建立逐条校对状态记录。来源核验、历史审校与当前译文校对是不同事项。
译文内容版本：7c3673a0f51c。用于比对文本，不代表校对等级或更新时间。
请填写对应原文、现译文、建议译法和理由。复制后通过你联系本站作者的渠道提交；此处不会自动发送。
