SN-2623 已核对来源，附原文与上下文。
试试 -datadir=
Try -datadir=
上次我试 $(shell /usr/bin/wx-config) 时，立刻有人为它引发的构建问题叫起来。当时没有时间调查。
Last time I tried $(shell /usr/bin/wx-config), there was immediate hollering about build problems with it. There wasn't time to investigate at the time.
$(shell /usr/bin/wx-config) 的一个问题是，它会抓到碰巧装在系统上的任何版本（wx 2.8）、任何配置（非 UTF-8）的 wxWidgets。-lwx_gtk2ud-2.9 只匹配正确的配置。如果 wxWidgets 是用错误配置构建的，它就会失败。
One problem with $(shell /usr/bin/wx-config) is it will pick up any version (wx 2.8 ) and any configuration (non-UTF-8 ) of wxWidgets that happens to be there. -lwx_gtk2ud-2.9 only matches the right configuration. It fails if wxWidgets was built with the wrong configuration.
引用 · 发言者未注明我记得在 freenode 的 #wxwidgets 聊天时，那边的开发者也搞不懂为什么要用它。
Iirc, chatting in #wxwidgets on freenode, the devs there were baffled why that was used.
他们有说为什么搞不懂吗？
Did they say why they were baffled?
引用 · 发言者未注明这是因为在我的系统上路径是 /usr/include/wx-2.9/wx/wx.h
This is because on my system the path is /usr/include/wx-2.9/wx/wx.h
为什么在那儿？是操作系统带的，还是你自己构建的？如果你构建的，我并不明白它为什么会把自己装到别的地方。
Why is it there? Was it included by the OS, or did you have to build it? If you built it, I wonder why it would put itself in a different place.
wxWidgets 2.9 最终有 Debian 包了吗？
Has wxWidgets 2.9 finally started to become available as a debian package?
也许我们该这样：
Maybe we should do this:
INCLUDEPATHS= \
INCLUDEPATHS= \
-I"/usr/local/include/wx-2.9" \
-I"/usr/local/include/wx-2.9" \
-I"/usr/local/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" \
-I"/usr/local/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" \
-I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" \
-I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" \
-I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9"
-I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9"
再说一遍，这些路径能确保只用 2.9，遇到 2.8 会失败。
Again, those paths help make sure it's only 2.9 and will fail with 2.8.
wxWidgets 2.8 有 ANSI 和 UTF-16 两种，对我们都是错的。它相当诱人，因它作为包唾手可得；在我们开始把 2.9 硬编码进 makefile 之前，很多人都被它折磨过。
wxWidgets 2.8 comes in ANSI and UTF-16, both wrong for us. It's tempting because it's so easily available as a package; a lot of people were frustrated by it until we started hardcoding 2.9 into the makefile.
