Bitcointalk

Who's the Spanish jerk draining the Faucet?

中本聪 · 2010 年 8 月 5 日

SN-2096 已核对来源,附原文与上下文。

阅读语言

悄无声息地失败会很难看。

Silently failing would look bad.

其他参与者原话gavinandresen原帖 ↗

1. 按 IP 地址首字节限速(本案是 79. 或 81.)。

1. Rate limit based on the first byte of the IP address (79. or 81. in this case).

中本聪回应

绝对需要。你考虑的限速额度是多少?说到底,限速总比让它全部流干强。

Definitely needed. What rate are you thinking of? Ultimately, it's better to rate limit it than to let it all drain out.

其他参与者原话gavinandresen原帖 ↗

3. 按 IP 反向 DNS 查询的最后两个域限速(本案是 rima-tde.net)。

3. Rate limit based on last two domains of reverse DNS lookup of the IP address (rima-tde.net in this case).

中本聪回应

这招可能出奇地好使。如果管用,能让他们撞不上限速线,而限速线作为最后一道防线仍在。

That might work surprisingly well. If it works, it keeps them from hitting the rate limit, but the rate limit is there as the last line of defence.

其他参与者原话gavinandresen原帖 ↗

4. 把标准发放额降到 0.5 比特币(自我启动 Faucet 以来,比特币已经涨了 10 倍)。

4. Make the standard amount given away 0.5 Bitcoins (Bitcoins have gone up 10 times in value since I started the Faucet).

中本聪回应

绝对是时候降了。

Definitely time to lower it.

上下文
来源
Bitcointalk 原始链接 ↗ 记录编号 SN-2096

阅读字号

选择适合你的字号,之后阅读会继续使用。