我已经开始实现类似的功能。大体上和 Gavin 描述的一样。
I have the beginning of something like this. It's mostly like what Gavin described.
再补充一些 rpc 接口:
Some more rpc interface:
move
move
从一个内部账户转到另一个。我想空白账户名("")会是你的默认账户。如果你卖东西给某个用户,能执行 move "theiraccount" "" 123.45。
Move from one internal account to another. I think blank account name ("") will be your default account. If you sell something to a user, you could do move "theiraccount" "" 123.45.
这个操作叫 "move" 最合适吗?我避开了 "transfer",因它听起来太像发送一笔交易。
Is "move" the best name for this? I shied away from "transfer" because that sounds too close to sending a transaction.
我在考虑新增一个 getaccountaddress 函数,而不是重载 getnewaddress:
I'm thinking a new function getaccountaddress instead of overloading getnewaddress:
getaccountaddress
getaccountaddress
给你一个从 getnewaddress
Gives you an address allocated from getnewaddress
有了这些命令,在简单场景下,你能否无需自建数据库就实现自己的网站?
Would these commands make it possible in simple cases to implement your website without needing a database of your own?
当前版本尚未建立逐条校对状态记录。来源核验、历史审校与当前译文校对是不同事项。
译文内容版本:bde32dc2df6a。用于比对文本,不代表校对等级或更新时间。
请填写对应原文、现译文、建议译法和理由。复制后通过你联系本站作者的渠道提交;此处不会自动发送。