SN-0192 已核对来源，附原文与上下文。
其他参与者原话Sabunir原帖 ↗. 也许与我连接的高延迟（平均 2000ms 以上）有关
. Perhaps it has to do with my connection's very high latency (2000ms or more on average)
双向各 2 秒的延迟，对你的生成成功率的影响应该小于 1%。
2 seconds of latency in both directions should reduce your generation success by less than 1%.
其他参与者原话Sabunir原帖 ↗和/或高丢包率（有时高达 10%）？
and/or my high packet loss (sometimes up to 10% loss)?
大概没问题，但我不确定。协议设计为重新同步到下一条消息，消息会向你连接的所有其他节点重新请求，直到收到。如果错过一个区块，每当有新区块进来、它发现有空缺时，也会继续请求。在最初发布之前，我做过一个测试：在高负载下随机丢弃 1/4 的消息，直到能整夜运行、没有任何节点卡住。
Probably OK, but I'm not sure. The protocol is designed to resync to the next message, and messages get re-requested from all the other nodes you're connected to until received. If you miss a block, it'll also keep requesting it every time another blocks comes in and it sees there's a gap. Before the original release I did a test dropping 1 out of 4 random messages under heavy load until I could run it overnight without any nodes getting stuck.
